
- Image via Wikipedia
Related articles by Zemanta
- Portable Desalination (technologyreview.com)
- Natural Catastrophe Costs: Up and to the Right (paul.kedrosky.com)
I wrote about the Land Conservation movement a few years back. In light of education reform efforts it’s worth revisiting the senseless contradictions inherent in many debates of this type.
The Land as Place…
The old paradigm has caused a polarity between conservation and development. Therefore developers ‘greenwash’ their plans to appease to conservationists. This becomes a political game.
So we educate learners to become one or the other; a developer or a conservationist. We thereby strengthen the polarization and it becomes a senseless contradiction that has no resolution in and of itself.
Like the cruise control directions to “set your speed a little slower than the person in front of you;” if everyone did this, we would slow all traffic to 35 mph as each repeatedly adjusts their speed downward in reaction to the continually slowing traffic before them. Why 35 mph? Because that is the minimum threshold for operating cruise control. Thus, the dumbing down of the majority, the mediocre mainstream, the leveling of minds to the least common denominator.
What we want adds up to what we don’t want. This is known as the fallacy of composition. Oscar Wilde wrote, » More: Fallacy of Composition: A Senseless Contradiction…
The three kingdoms – human, animal, and plant – share the same biosphere. Because humans possess the highest form of intelligence, they bear the greatest responsibility in caring for their environment. During the development of this stewardship, certain choices were made in order to ‘manage’ the environment. Through trial and error, the best choices became the norms of society and in order to protect those norms, laws were enacted. Localized cultures formed around these regional environmental practices and today, we have all grown up within certain cultural constraints that taught us how to live and ‘manage’ our personal universe for the good of all according to our entrenched world-view.
I recently read a fellow student’s post entitled, “Nature is Undefinable.” My reply is as follows:
Though it may be true that we have yet to exhaust our research in order to come up with an adequate definition, as intelligent beings who bear the principle responsibility as the planet’s stewards, I believe our quest to define nature is not in vain.
Actually, Ashworth in his book, “The Left Hand of Eden,” does a good job of exposing the inherent contradiction we face by looking at nature as “other” and somehow separate from US. Even reading the posts, you can see the circular reasoning and logical fallacies expressed by nearly everyone because of this intrinsic contradiction.
We know we are “supposed” to be one with nature yet everyone discusses nature as “other” and thereby perpetuates the misunderstanding. Until we resolve this elemental fact, we cannot hope to rescue our future from its collision course with disaster.
In our world, there are just 118 known elements. These 118 elements make up every iota of physical matter including ourselves. It doesn’t matter whether you drive a Cadillac and I ride a bicycle; you wear fur coats and I wear second hand; you eat caviar and I eat from a trash can. Regardless, you and I cannot exceed the bounds of the 118 known elements. We are imprisoned with all of creation inside the four walls of » More: The Definition of Nature is Elemental…
Anthropocentrism – The world-view espoused by a bunch of egocentrics.
Biocentrism – The world-view espoused by egocentrics who think they’re enlightened.
Ecocentristm – The world-view espoused by egocentrics who think they are more clever than Biocentrics.
Envirocentrism – The world-view espoused by really, Really clever, attention-craving egocentrics.
Interdependency – A fancy way of saying that each one of us is unique…just like everyone else.
Overconsumption and Overpopulation – What you fear can happen if you believe Nature can’t take care of herself.
Geological vs. Human Time – A good way to see how significant mankind really is since we’ve made such an impact in such a short time.
Environmental Language – Spin, double-speak, politico. See also, ‘forked tongue’.
Of course I am having fun with this but don’t assume my definitions are untrue. These five themes are revisited by all groups on both sides of the environment centered debates. An example can be heard among our current presidential contenders and their groupies.
The challenge of making sense of all this is demanding, as mentioned by fellow classmate Antonio Guerrero in his post on Interdependency. But like all large calculations, reducing the equation to the simplest terms can be a useful first step. » More: Environmental Themes…
The microscopic world so small
The super macro high and tall
Unreachable they seem at best
Such reason cannot stop man’s quest
From subatomic particles
To Galaxies in constant swirls
For movement most centrifugal
Yet life of meaning hardly full
From small to large the search goes on
From high to low, from short to long
Though man conceives eternity
When in the dark it’s hard to see
For depth of soul has not been plumbed
And height of Spirit not yet climbed
Except for One whose overall
Who can’t be named by man so small
Such mystery, how can it be?
Yet one who tastes will surely see
Reality experienced
Yet not explained by common sense
The living know though can’t explain
The life beyond the space/time plane
They see by their experience
The life beyond the human fence
The wheel of life in cyclic flow
Science does this life man show
Yet wheel within the wheel is dim
To those with conscience marred by sin
And with the light within comes truth
Yet not for lofty heads comes forth
As water fills the empty cup
So humble souls the truth fills up
The wheel within the wheel is seen
Experienced beyond the mind
It lies within the deepest part
The likes of which most never find.
- by Dallas McPheeters
1. “How deep the ruts of tradition and conformity!” (Thoreau, Walden, paragraph 6 of Conclusion)
The Simple Living movement recognizes the superficiality of present day society which, though formed with mankind’s happiness in view, has not succeeded in achieving it. Thoreau, who saw through the facade from nearly every angle, said it best when he penned, “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” (Economy, paragraph 9). His view of the modern world’s pursuit of luxuries was a “positive hindrance to the elevation of mankind.” (Ibid, paragraph 19). He had come to realize that ‘being’ was more important then ‘doing’ but that society had only framed a universe for the latter rather than the former. The Simple Living movement therefore, is interested in » More: We are “Human Beings” (not ‘human doings’)